High Court's Bail Order for Accused in Land Dispute Murder Case Quashed by Supreme Court of India
Summary of the Judgment
The present appeals were filed by the original informant/complainant, challenging the orders of the High Court releasing the accused on bail. The complainant contended that the High Court has materially erred in releasing the respondents-accused on bail, particularly when the offenses alleged were for the offenses under Section 302, which was a serious offense.
The Supreme Court held that the High Court had not properly appreciated the seriousness and gravity of the offenses committed by the accused. The Court noted that the land dispute between the father of the accused and the complainant side was the motive behind the offenses alleged in the FIR. The Court held that when the accused persons were facing trial under Sections 147, 148, 307, 302, and other offenses of IPC, which could be said to be very serious offenses, the High Court ought to have given cogent reasons while releasing the accused on bail.
The Court observed that the High Court had not given any independent reasons while releasing the respective accused on bail, except narrating the submissions made on behalf of the accused and the state. The Court held that the High Court failed to consider the seriousness and gravity of the offenses, and no cogent reasons were assigned by the High Court while releasing the accused on bail.
In conclusion, the judgment is significant as it highlights the importance of considering the seriousness and gravity of offenses while granting bail. The judgment reinforces the principles of justice and accountability and upholds the law's dignity.
If you don't see the Judgment please Login to Your Account or Create Your Free Account to View Full Judgments!